Dec. 29, 2006
BOOK REVIEW: Beast on the East River Rages against UNs World
Government Aspects, Alleged Attempts to Supplant U.S. Sovereignty
Reviewed By David M. Kinchen
Huntington News Network Book Critic
Hinton, WV (HNN) Nathans Tabors The Beast on the East River: The
UN
Threat to America's Sovereignty and Security (Thomas Nelson/Nelson
Current,
304 pages, notes, bibliography, index, $24.99) pulls no punches in its
antipathy to the 61-year-old organization on Manhattans East Side.
Tabor doesnt like the aspects of the United Nations that impinge on
U.S.
laws and sovereignty, including but definitely not limited to -- what
he
says are attempts to take away gun ownership rights; using abortion as
population control; using junk science to lower our standard of
living by
driving up the cost of energy sources; the controversial Law of the Sea
Treaty aptly named LOST; and placing U.S. soldiers under the command
of
UN officers in peacekeeping missions.
In the latter instance, he discusses the fate of U.S. Army Spec-4
Michael
New, who refused to wear the U.N. uniform when President Clinton
ordered
U.S. troops into U.N. service in Macedonia in 1995. For his refusal to
don
the U.N. uniform, New was court-martialed and given a dishonorable
discharge, even though he had served with distinction as a medic in the
1990-91 Gulf War.
Tabor definitely doesnt care for the International Criminal Court,
which
uses inquisitorial methods reminiscent of Nazi Germanys People Courts
my
analogy -- and in fact has a German named Hans-Peter Kaul as one of its
inaugural judges. Tabor points out that the ICC is not to be confused
with
the World Court in The Hague; in fact, the U.S. has not ratified the
Rome
Treaty of 1998 that created the ICC.
If youre a liberal, youll probably automatically dismiss Tabors
polemic
as part of the Black Helicopter school of fear mongering; if youre a
conservative, youll probably agree with his attack on the often
scandal-ridden organization that many view as part of the problem, not
part
of the solution.
There seems to be no middle ground on the subject. My litmus test is
the
treatment of departing U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John R. Bolton. I
think
hes a breath of fresh air, but he resigned rather than face a
confirmation
battle that he would probably lose. Conservatives love the in-your-face
Bolton; liberals hate him. President Bush appointed Bolton using a
recess
appointment in August 2005 and his resignation was accepted Dec. 9,
2006.
Alejandro Daniel Wolff, Deputy U.S. Representative to the United
Nations,
will be acting representative until a permanent replacement is found.
Even its staunch supporters agree that the UN is desperately in need of
reform. The past 10 years under outgoing Secretary General Kofi Annan
have
seen scandal after scandal many involving Annan, 68, of Ghana, who
will be
replaced on Jan. 1, 2007 by Ban Ki-Moon of South Korea as the UNs
eighth
secretary general.
Tabor traces the idea of a supranational organization back to
Tennysons
1842 poem Locksley Hall, which spoke of
the Parliament of Man, the
Federation of the World./ There the common sense of most shall hold a
fretful realm in awe, / And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in
universal law.
The poem was an inspiration to those who worked to form the League of
Nations, promoted by President Woodrow Wilson, but rejected by the U.S.
Congress in 1920 because of Wilsons refusal to compromise, Tabor says.
He
also notes that President Harry S. Truman, one of the biggest
supporters of
the United Nations in 1945, carried a copy of Locksley Hall in his
wallet.
While its definitely a polemic, The Beast on the East River is well
researched, exploring the concepts of world organizations, world
federalism
and the final step, world government. Tabor quotes extensively from the
writings of Professor Inis L. Claude of the University of Virginia who
says
there is little or no difference between world federalism and world
government: World federalism is just a sugar-coated euphemism for World
Government, the distinguished professor of government has written.
Tabor quotes from advocates of World Federalism/Government who call for
an
end to traditional nation states, to be subsumed by an even more
powerful
U.N., financed by taxes on emails, with a standing army of mercenaries
similar to the French Foreign Legion. National sovereignty would
gradually
disappear, much like it is being eaten away by such supranational
combinations as the European Union, Tabor says.
Some might be put off by Tabors quoting John Birch Society sources
(Get
the U.S. Out of the U.N. and the U.N. Out of the U.S. has been the JBS
slogan for more than 40 years), but those who dont want the U.S.
which
contributes 22 percent of the budget of the bureaucracy bloated UN to
give
up any more of its sovereignty to the world body will find many talking
points in Tabors book. Full disclosure: As a libertarian, I count
myself in
this group, so Tabor was preaching to the choir in my case.
I did note a minor error: Tabor says that Pat Buchanan, of whom he
speaks
favorably, is in his 70s. Buchanan was born in November 1938, so hes a
mere
68! Hes exactly one month younger than the present reviewer.
Publishers web site: www.thomasnelson.com
Authors web site: www.theconservativevoice.com